Dynamic Palm Tree Architecture for Energy-Efficient Data Aggregation Using Sugeno Fuzzy Inference System
Abstract
Traditional data aggregation methods often result in excessive energy consumption, increased aggregation time, and inefficient node selection, limiting their applicability in large-scale UWSNs. The existing approach suffers from redundancy in data aggregation, suboptimal selection of master and local centres, and unbalanced energy utilization, leading to reduced network lifetime. To address these challenges, this work introduced an improved data aggregation scheme based on a palm tree-inspired hierarchical architecture, incorporating fuzzy logic for dynamic node selection. The OPT-FIS utilized a multi-criteria fuzzy logic-based decision-making system to optimize the selection of local centres, considering parameters such as leaflet angle, residual energy, distance to the master node, and energy-to-distance ratio. Fuzzy inference rules, which evaluate the inputs, were created to determine node suitability for local centre selection. The performance of the developed OPT-FIS was evaluated against the existing method using performance metrics of aggregation energy, aggregation time, aggregation ratio, network lifetime, and selection efficiency for master and local centres. The results of the implementation across various communication ranges of 400m, 500m, and 600m showed that the OPT-FIS improved energy efficiency, achieving a reduction in aggregation energy by 8.70%, 10.81%, and 7.98%, as well as a reduction in aggregation time by 13.71%, 18.60%, and 9.84%, respectively. The results showed that the OPT-FIS provides a scalable, energy-efficient, and adaptive approach to data aggregation in underwater wireless sensor networks.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alakhras, M., Oussalah, M., & Hussein, M. (2020). A survey of fuzzy logic in wireless localization. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2020, 1-45.
Ayyadurai, M., Seetha, J., Haque, S. M. F. U., Juliana, R., & Karthikeyan, C. (2023). Routing algorithm for underwater acoustic sensor network. Neural Processing Letters, 55(1), 441-457.
Bhajantri, L. B. (2018). A comprehensive survey on data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 6(7), 817-822.
Camastra, F., Ciaramella, A., Giovannelli, V., Lener, M., Rastelli, V., Staiano, A., Staiano, G., & Starace, A. (2015). A fuzzy decision system for genetically modified plant environmental risk assessment using Mamdani inference. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(3), 1710-1716.
Cavallaro, F. (2015). A Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy inference system for developing a sustainability index of biomass. Sustainability, 7(9), 12359-12371.
Habib, M. A., Saha, S., Razzaque, M. A., Mamun-or-Rashid, M., Fortino, G., & Hassan, M. M. (2018). Starfish routing for sensor networks with mobile sink. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 123, 11-22.
Hamilton, A., Holdcroft, S., Fenucci, D., Mitchell, P., Morozs, N., Munafò, A., & Sitbon, J. (2020). Adaptable underwater networks: The relation between autonomy and communications. Remote Sensing, 12(20), 3290.
Haruna, J., Abdulrazaq, M. B., & Yahaya, B. (2025). Secure Energy-Efficient Device-to-Device Communication for IoT in Smart Cities. 13(2), 330–346.
Haque, K. F., Kabir, K. H., & Abdelgawad, A. (2020). Advancement of routing protocols and applications of underwater wireless sensor network (UWSN)—A survey. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 9(2), 19.
Ismail, M., Islam, M., Ahmad, I., Khan, F. A., Qazi, A. B., Khan, Z. H., Wadud, Z., & Al-Rakhami, M. (2020). Reliable path selection and opportunistic routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 8, 100346-100364.
Jouhari, M., Ibrahimi, K., Tembine, H., & Ben-Othman, J. (2019). Underwater wireless sensor networks: A survey on enabling technologies, localization protocols, and internet of underwater things. IEEE Access, 7, 96879-96899.
Karimi, H., Khamforoosh, K., & Maihami, V. (2022). Improvement of DBR routing protocol in underwater wireless sensor networks using fuzzy logic and bloom filter. Plos one, 17(2), e0263418.
Kathiroli, P., & Kanmani, S. (2024). Data aggregation by enhanced squirrel search optimization algorithm for in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 1-21.
Kaveripakam, S., & Chinthaginjala, R. (2023). Clustering-based dragonfly optimization algorithm for underwater wireless sensor networks. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 81, 580-598.
Khan, A., Ahmedy, I., Anisi, M. H., Javaid, N., Ali, I., Khan, N., Alsaqer, M., & Mahmood, H. (2018a). A localization-free interference and energy holes minimization routing for underwater wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 18(1), 165.
Khan, A., Ali, I., Ghani, A., Khan, N., Alsaqer, M., Rahman, A. U., & Mahmood, H. (2018b). Routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks: Taxonomy, research challenges, routing strategies and future directions. Sensors, 18(5), 1619.
Krishnaswamy, V., & Manvi, S. S. (2022). Palm tree structure based data aggregation and routing in underwater wireless acoustic sensor networks: Agent oriented approach. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(4), 1275-1284.
Luo, T., Zhang, B., Li, J., Xiao, J., Li, C., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, J. (2024). An innovative cluster routing method for performance enhancement in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal.
Momoh, M., Ibe, C. C., Mohammed, A., Abbe, G. E., Ter, K. P., Obari, J. A., & Bulama, H. I. (2025). A Low-cost Antenna Tracking System Integrated with GPS for UAVs. Computer Engineering and Applications Journal, 14(3).
Murnawan, M., Virgana, R., & Lestari, S. (2021). Comparison of Sugeno and Tsukamoto fuzzy inference system method for determining estimated production amount. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(8), 1467-1476.
Shovon, I. I., & Shin, S. (2022). Survey on multi-path routing protocols of underwater wireless sensor networks: Advancement and applications. Electronics, 11(21), 3467.
Song, Y. (2020). Underwater acoustic sensor networks with cost efficiency for internet of underwater things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 68(2), 1707-1716.
Subramani, N., Mohan, P., Alotaibi, Y., Alghamdi, S., & Khalaf, O. I. (2022). An efficient metaheuristic-based clustering with routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 22(2), 415.
Sun, Y., Zheng, M., Han, X., Ge, W., & Yin, J. (2023). MOR: Multi-objective routing for underwater acoustic wireless sensor networks. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 158, 154444.
Yadav, R. S. (2021). Application of soft computing techniques to calculation of medicine dose during the treatment of patient: A fuzzy logic approach. Handbook of Computational Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering and Healthcare, 151–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822260-7.00003-0
Zhang, L., Qi, J., & Wu, H. (2023). A novel data aggregation method for underwater wireless sensor networks using ant colony optimization algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(4).
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Chen, L., & Wang, X. (2021). Reinforcement learning-based opportunistic routing protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 70(3), 2756-2770.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.